Duraid Wadie

Head of M&A Architecture

Medium Article · 3 min read · May 19, 2020

The Diagrams That Changed How Our Teams Actually Worked

ArchitectureDecision MakingDeploymentAuthenticationAI

Article summary

The Diagrams That Changed How Our Teams Actually Worked I used to treat diagrams like documentation-something you created after the decisions were made. But the first time I drew a boundary diagram during a roadmap meeting-and watched two teams stop arguing and start agreeing-I realized I’d misunderstood their purpose completely. Architecture diagrams aren’t just artifacts. They’re alignment tools. Done right, they change how people reason about systems, how they negotiate ownership, and how they design under pressure. The First Diagram That Actually Mattered I was helping split a shared service that had become a bottleneck. Everyone agreed in theory-but couldn’t align on scope, dependencies, or who would take what.

Read Full Article on Medium

Practical takeaway

The main idea behind The Diagrams That Changed How Our Teams Actually Worked is to help teams move from broad theory to clear, repeatable decision making. When teams apply this thinking, they reduce ambiguity and focus on improvements that deliver measurable momentum.

Example scenario

Imagine a team facing competing priorities. By applying the ideas in The Diagrams That Changed How Our Teams Actually Worked, they can map dependencies, identify risks and choose the next move that produces progress without destabilizing their system.

Common mistakes to avoid

How to apply this in real work

Start by identifying where The Diagrams That Changed How Our Teams Actually Worked already shows up in your architecture or delivery flow. Then pick one area where clarity would reduce friction. Apply the idea, measure its effect and share the learning.

Signs you are doing it correctly

Share: in LinkedIn 𝕏 Twitter