Duraid Wadie

Head of M&A Architecture

Medium Article · 2 min read · Jun 18, 2018

The Pitfall of Silent Dependencies-And How We Made Them Explicit

ArchitectureFeature FlagsObservabilityArchitectsOrganizational CultureAPIAuthenticationSystem Design Concepts

Article summary

The Pitfall of Silent Dependencies-And How We Made Them Explicit Our system didn’t break because of one big failure. It broke because of a dozen small, hidden dependencies that we didn’t even realize were critical-until they weren’t there. A third-party service slowed down. An internal API returned partial data. A misconfigured feature flag disabled a critical path. All independent. All seemingly isolated. But together, they quietly pulled threads until the whole flow unraveled. That’s when we realized: dependencies don’t have to be down to be dangerous-they just have to be silent. How Silent Dependencies Snuck Into Our Architecture 1. Feature Flags Without Visibility Flags toggled core logic paths. But nobody owned the audit trail.

Read Full Article on Medium

Practical takeaway

The main idea behind The Pitfall of Silent Dependencies-And How We Made Them Explicit is to help teams move from broad theory to clear, repeatable decision making. When teams apply this thinking, they reduce ambiguity and focus on improvements that deliver measurable momentum.

Example scenario

Imagine a team facing competing priorities. By applying the ideas in The Pitfall of Silent Dependencies-And How We Made Them Explicit, they can map dependencies, identify risks and choose the next move that produces progress without destabilizing their system.

Common mistakes to avoid

How to apply this in real work

Start by identifying where The Pitfall of Silent Dependencies-And How We Made Them Explicit already shows up in your architecture or delivery flow. Then pick one area where clarity would reduce friction. Apply the idea, measure its effect and share the learning.

Signs you are doing it correctly

Share: in LinkedIn 𝕏 Twitter