We Didn’t Just Move to Azure-We Re-Architected How We Delivered Software
Article summary
We thought the cloud migration would be a lift-and-shift. It wasn’t. Moving to Azure forced us to confront how we built, deployed, monitored, and scaled every part of our system. The infrastructure changed-but so did our mental model of what “shipping software” meant. Here’s what Azure helped us fix, what nearly broke us, and how we rebuilt our architecture in the process. What Changed When We Migrated to Azure 1. Infrastructure Was No Longer an Afterthought In our on-prem setup, infra was static. Config drift was manual. Provisioning was tribal knowledge.
Read Full Article on MediumPractical takeaway
The main idea behind We Didn’t Just Move to Azure-We Re-Architected How We Delivered Software is to help teams move from broad theory to clear, repeatable decision making. When teams apply this thinking, they reduce ambiguity and focus on improvements that deliver measurable momentum.
Example scenario
Imagine a team facing competing priorities. By applying the ideas in We Didn’t Just Move to Azure-We Re-Architected How We Delivered Software, they can map dependencies, identify risks and choose the next move that produces progress without destabilizing their system.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Trying to redesign everything instead of taking small steps.
- Ignoring real constraints like incentives, ownership or legacy systems.
- Creating documents that do not lead to any change in code or decisions.
How to apply this in real work
Start by identifying where We Didn’t Just Move to Azure-We Re-Architected How We Delivered Software already shows up in your architecture or delivery flow. Then pick one area where clarity would reduce friction. Apply the idea, measure its effect and share the learning.
Signs you are doing it correctly
- Teams make decisions faster and with fewer disagreements.
- Architectural conversations become clearer and less abstract.
- Changes land safely with fewer surprises or rework cycles.