Duraid Wadie

Head of M&A Architecture

Medium Article · 2 min read · Nov 14, 2018

When Microservices Became Macro Pain

MicroservicesObservabilityArchitectureExit StrategyDeploymentAuthenticationDecision MakingAgile

Article summary

When Microservices Became Macro Pain We didn’t choose microservices lightly. They promised speed, agility, and independence-and initially, they delivered. Developers moved swiftly, deployments became simpler, and scaling individual services felt effortless. But two years into our journey, we encountered an unexpected tipping point. Our architecture, which had grown into a vast network of interconnected small services, began to hinder rather than help us. It wasn’t a single catastrophic failure that slowed us down. Instead, complexity crept in gradually, unnoticed at first but overwhelming once fully realized. Services multiplied without clear oversight, dependencies grew silently complex, and diagnosing even simple problems turned into multi-day investigations.

Read Full Article on Medium

Practical takeaway

The main idea behind When Microservices Became Macro Pain is to help teams move from broad theory to clear, repeatable decision making. When teams apply this thinking, they reduce ambiguity and focus on improvements that deliver measurable momentum.

Example scenario

Imagine a team facing competing priorities. By applying the ideas in When Microservices Became Macro Pain, they can map dependencies, identify risks and choose the next move that produces progress without destabilizing their system.

Common mistakes to avoid

How to apply this in real work

Start by identifying where When Microservices Became Macro Pain already shows up in your architecture or delivery flow. Then pick one area where clarity would reduce friction. Apply the idea, measure its effect and share the learning.

Signs you are doing it correctly

Share: in LinkedIn 𝕏 Twitter