Duraid Wadie

Head of M&A Architecture

Medium Article · 2 min read · May 22, 2018

Why ‘Resilience’ Wasn’t Enough-We Needed Graceful Degradation

System Design ConceptsArchitectureObservabilityOrganizational CultureAI

Article summary

Every architecture diagram had a circuit breaker. Retries. Fallbacks. Redundant zones. If one component failed, traffic was rerouted, retried, or paused. We thought we were resilient. But when things went sideways, the system didn’t just stay up-it limped. And users noticed. We hadn’t designed for failure. We’d only protected our uptime. That’s when we realized: resilience keeps systems alive-but graceful degradation keeps users with you. What Resilience Missed 1. The System Stayed Up-But the Experience Broke Our homepage loaded, but widgets failed silently A checkout completed, but confirmations never sent User dashboards froze while background services retried endlessly The backend “survived.” The user experience didn’t. 2.

Read Full Article on Medium

Practical takeaway

The main idea behind Why ‘Resilience’ Wasn’t Enough-We Needed Graceful Degradation is to help teams move from broad theory to clear, repeatable decision making. When teams apply this thinking, they reduce ambiguity and focus on improvements that deliver measurable momentum.

Example scenario

Imagine a team facing competing priorities. By applying the ideas in Why ‘Resilience’ Wasn’t Enough-We Needed Graceful Degradation, they can map dependencies, identify risks and choose the next move that produces progress without destabilizing their system.

Common mistakes to avoid

How to apply this in real work

Start by identifying where Why ‘Resilience’ Wasn’t Enough-We Needed Graceful Degradation already shows up in your architecture or delivery flow. Then pick one area where clarity would reduce friction. Apply the idea, measure its effect and share the learning.

Signs you are doing it correctly

Share: in LinkedIn 𝕏 Twitter