Why We Introduced Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)
Article summary
Why We Introduced Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) Our architecture discussions were always vibrant and insightful, yet decisions often faded into obscurity soon after they were made. Months later, we’d find ourselves debating the same issues again, retracing our steps without clarity or consensus. The lack of documented reasoning meant that valuable context behind critical decisions was lost over time, leading to confusion and technical drift. To address this, we introduced Architectural Decision Records (ADRs). Initially, this felt like adding another layer of paperwork, but we quickly saw its transformative value. Why Our Architecture Decisions Became Unmanageable Without formal records, decisions were often scattered across meeting notes, chats, and emails. Rationale faded, context disappeared, and every decision became isolated from the next.
Read Full Article on MediumPractical takeaway
The main idea behind Why We Introduced Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) is to help teams move from broad theory to clear, repeatable decision making. When teams apply this thinking, they reduce ambiguity and focus on improvements that deliver measurable momentum.
Example scenario
Imagine a team facing competing priorities. By applying the ideas in Why We Introduced Architectural Decision Records (ADRs), they can map dependencies, identify risks and choose the next move that produces progress without destabilizing their system.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Trying to redesign everything instead of taking small steps.
- Ignoring real constraints like incentives, ownership or legacy systems.
- Creating documents that do not lead to any change in code or decisions.
How to apply this in real work
Start by identifying where Why We Introduced Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) already shows up in your architecture or delivery flow. Then pick one area where clarity would reduce friction. Apply the idea, measure its effect and share the learning.
Signs you are doing it correctly
- Teams make decisions faster and with fewer disagreements.
- Architectural conversations become clearer and less abstract.
- Changes land safely with fewer surprises or rework cycles.